泭
泭
Bartek and Dorota, during their second meeting within Athropology Club, are going to try to reply to these and other questions. This lecture will be focused on the bitter sweet stories from various Lyuli mahallas in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. How the Domari people live, work and party? How do they perceive themselves? How do they spend their free time and why don't they trust the outsiders?
Let's see how many stereotypes can we break and how many of them are going to persist'.
Dorota and Bartek are two independant researchers from Poland. Bartek gratuated from Russian Literature faculty and Dorota got her PhD based upon the dissertation in-between French Literature and Anthropology. They left Poland for a long time in May 2014 and since then they travel and work in Asia. They were recently teaching at Kasetsart University in Bangkok and International Binus University in Jakarta. Besides teaching and research projects, they are writers, journalists and cat lovers.
泭
泭
訄 迡訄郇郇郋邿 赲迮迮 迡迮郇 郕訄 竄郅郋訇訄郅邽郱訄邽, 邾邽迣訄邽 邽 訄郇郇訄邽郋郇訄郅邽郱邾罈 郈迮迡訄赲 赲郋邽 郕郋赲迮 訄訇郋 郈郋 迮邾迮 訄郇訄郇邽郋郇訄郅郇 訇訄郕郋赲, 赲 郕郋郋 郋迡邽郇 邽郱 郈迣郋赲 邽郱 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽, 訄 赲郋郋邿 邽郱 郅訇郋邿 迡迣郋邿 訄邽 邾邽訄. 郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅邽 郈郋迡迮郅 郋迮郇 邽郇迮迮郇郋邿 邽 訄郱郇郋郋訇訄郱郇郋邿 郕郋郅郅迮郕邽迮邿 邽郋邽邿 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋-郱邽訄郕邽 訇訄郕郋赲 迣訄迠迡訄郇訄邾邽 苤虼, 赲郋郈, 訄郱邽郅邽邽, 苠邽邽, 訄郇訄 邽 郋迮邽. 衪郋 邽郋邽邽 郋迣郋, 郕訄郕 邽 郈訄 赲迮邽郅邽, 郈郋迠迮郇邽郅邽 邽 郕訄郕 郋郇邽 迠邽赲 迮迣郋迡郇. 苠訄郕迠迮 郈迮郱迮郇訄郋 郈郋迡迮郅 赲郋邽邾邽 訄迠迡迮郇邽邾邽 郋 郋邾, 郋 郱郇訄邽 迠邽 赲 訄郇郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邾 訇訄郕迮, 赲 迮邾 迮迣郋 郈迮邽邾迮赲訄 邽 迡郇郋邽, 郕訄郕 赲 郇邽 赲郋郈邽赲訄 迡迮邽, 郕訄郕 訄郱迮訄 訄郱郅邽邽 赲 郕郅迮, 郱郕迮 邽 迮郅邽迣邽邽, 邽 郋 訄郕邽迮 邽郋邽邽 迣郋赲郋 郇訄邾 郋 訇迡迮邾 邾邽郋赲郋迣郋 郋郋訇迮赲訄, 郕郋郋郋迮 訄郇郋赲邽 赲迮 訇郋郅迮迮 邾郋訇邽郅郇邾 邽 訄郱郇郋郋訇訄郱郇邾.
泭
郋邿 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽邽, 郇訄邾迮迮郇 郈郋訄郇訄郅邽郱邽郋赲訄 訄郱郅邽郇迮 郈訄郕邽郕邽 邽 迡邽郕 郋 竄郈邽郋迡迮罈 邽 竄郋郕迠訄迮迮邿 迮迡迮罈 郈郋邾郋 訄郱郅邽郇 郅訄迮赲, 郕訄郕 郕郋郋赲郋迡赲郋 邽 邽郱邾 郇訄 郋郱迮迮 苤郋郇迣- 迮郅 赲 訄郇郕郋邿 郋訇郅訄邽. 苠邽郱邾 赲 郈郋郋赲迮郕郋邾 郕迣郱郕郋邿 郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽 訇郅邽 赲迮迣迡訄 郈郋郇郋邿 迮邾郋邿, 郇迮 郋郅郕郋 郕訄郕 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕邽邿 邽郅邽 郈郋郅邽邽迮郕邽邿 赲郋郈郋 郇訄 郇訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邾 郋赲郇迮, 郇郋 訄郕迠迮 邽邾赲郋郅邽迮郕郋邾, 郇訄 邾迮郇郋邾 郋赲郇迮. 訄郕 邽 邽邾赲郋郅邽迮郕邽迮 邽 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋迮 "郈郋訄郇赲訄" 郕郋迮郅邽 邾迮郇邾邽 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇邽邾邽 邽 郕郋郋赲郋迡迮郕郋邿 郈訄郕邽郕郋邿? 郕訄郕郋邿 迮郈迮郇邽 郋赲迮郕郋迮 郇訄郅迮迡邽迮 邽迣訄迮 郋郅? 郕訄郕 郋郅 郕郋郋赲郋迡迮郕訄 郕郅訄 邽迣訄 赲 邾迮郇郋邾 郋郈郋邽赲郅迮郇邽邽? 苺邽赲訄 郕郋郇郅邽郕, 赲 迣郋郇郋迡郋訇赲訄迮邿 郋訄郅邽, 訄 訄郕迠迮, 赲 郋訇郅訄邽 郱訄迣郱郇迮郇邽 郋郕迠訄迮邿 迮迡, 訄郕迠迮 郈郋郈訄 郈郋訄郇訄郅邽郱邽郋赲訄 迣郋迡訄赲迮郇郇迮 郕郋郇迮郈邽邽 赲 郋訇郅訄邽 郕郋郅郋迣邽邽.
:
郅訄郇 訄邽邾郋赲 郈郋郅邽郅 迮郈迮郇 迡郋郕郋訄 赲 迮邿 虼郕郋郅迮 苤郋邽訄郅郇 訄郕 (EHESS - 苳訄郇邽, 郈郋迣訄邾邾訄 "cotutelle") 邽 郕訄郇迡邽迡訄 邽郋邽迮郕邽 郇訄郕 訄邽郋郇訄郅郇郋邿 郕訄迡迮邾邽邽 . 郇 赲郅迮 迡郋迮郇郋邾 郈郋迣訄邾邾 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 苺虷. 苠訄郕迠迮 赲郅郅 郅迮郇郋邾 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅郕郋邿 迣郈郈 邾迮迠迡郇訄郋迡郇郋迣郋 郈郋迮郕訄 (CNRS-苳訄郇邽) 郈郋 迮邾迮: 竄訄郋訄郅郇迮 郋訇迮赲訄 赲 郈迮迮郋迡郇邿 郈迮邽郋迡: 郈郋訄郇赲郋 邽 邾迮郇迮 赲郅訄邽罈. 訄邾郕訄 郋迣郋 郈郋迮郕訄, 郋郇 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅 郈郋郅迮赲迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 赲 邽迣迮迮, 迣郱訄郇迮 邽 訄郱訄訄郇迮. 郇 郋郈訇郅邽郕郋赲訄郅 訄訇郋 郈郋 訄郱郅邽郇邾 赲郋郈郋 訄郇郋邾訄邽邽 郕迣郱郕郋迣郋 邽 郕訄郱訄郕郋迣郋 郈訄郋訄郅郇 郋郋訇迮赲 赲 郋赲迮郕邽迮 赲迮邾迮郇訄, 邽 迮迣郋 郇訄郇迮 邽郇迮迮 郕郋迮赲郇邽郕邽 邽 郋邽訄郅邽郱邾, 邾邽迣訄邽 邽 訄郇郇訄邽郋郇訄郅邽郱邾 赲 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽, 郈郋郅邽邽迮郕訄 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽, 郕郅郇郋迮 郇訄郅迮迡邽迮.
泭
迮邾郋 郇訄 郋, 郋 郕郋郇郅邽郕 邾迮迠迡 邽郇郋訄郇郇邾邽 邽郇赲迮郋訄邾邽 邽 "邾迮郇邾邽 郋郋訇迮赲訄邾邽" 郈郋迡郋郅迠訄 郇訄 郈郋迠迮郇邽邽 邾郇郋迣邽 郅迮 邽 郋赲訄赲訄 訇迮郱 邽郕郅迮郇邽 赲迮 郋訇郅訄邽 訄郇, 郇訄 迡郋 邽 郈郋 郇迮 郅郋迠邽郅郋 郇郋迮 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇邽迮 郋訇 訄郇邽郕訄 邽 郕郋郇郅邽郕郋赲. 郋 訄郕邽迮 "邾迮郇迮 訄郕郋", 郕郋郋迮 迣郋赲郋 郋訇 郕郋郅郋迣邽迮郕邽 邽郕訄 邽 郕郋郋迮 邾郋訇邽郅邽郱 郋迡郇郋迮郅訄郇 郈郋邽赲 迣郋郇郋迡郋訇赲訄邽 郈郋迮郕郋赲 迡訄迠迮 郇訄 訄迡邽邽 訄郱訄訇郋郕邽? 苤, 邽郇赲迮郋 邽 迡訄迠迮 郕郈迮 邽郋郕郋 郈郋迮訇郅 訄郕邽迮 迮邾邽郇 郕訄郕 郕邽邾邽郇訄郅, "迮郇迮", 邾迮郇迮 郅邽, 邽 郈郋迮迡郇邽郕邽 迡郅 邽 郋訇郋郱郇訄迮郇邽. 虴郋 赲 郕郋郇迮郇郋邾 邽郋迣迮 迮迮 訇郋郅迮 邾邽邽郱邽迮 邽 迡訄迠迮 迡迮邾郋郇邽郱邽迮 邽 訄郇邽郕郋赲. 郇郋赲赲訄 郇訄 郇郋迣訄邽迮郕郋邾 邽郱迮郇邽邽 郋迡郇郋迣郋 郕郋郇郅邽郕訄 (苠訄郅訄郕訄 郋訇郅訄), 郈郋郈訄 郈郋郕訄郱訄 訄邾訇邽赲訄郅迮郇 "訄迣迮郇郇郋" 邽 訄郇邽郕郋赲 邽 邽 郇迮郋迡郇郋郱郇訄郇郋迮 邾迮郋 赲 邾郋郱訄邽郕迮 邾迮郇郋邿 郈郋郅邽邽郕邽. 郇迮 訇 郋迮郅郋 郋訇訄邽 赲郇邽邾訄郇邽迮 郇訄 邽 迡赲郋邿郇 郈郋赲迮郕 迡郇 (赲郅訄 邽 郕郋郅郋迣邽), 邽 赲郋郈邽邽 邾訄邿郇邽郇迣郋赲 郈郋迮郕郋赲 邽 邽 郋郅 赲 郋邾邽郋赲訄郇邽 郇迮迣訄邽赲郇郋迣郋 邾郇迮郇邽 郋 郈郋迮郕訄 迮迡邽 邾迮郇 迠邽迮郅迮邿. 迡郇訄郕郋 邽 郋郅 赲 郋邾邽郋赲訄郇邽邽 邾迮郇郋迣郋 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇郋迣郋 邾郇迮郇邽 郋迣訄郇邽迮郇訄. 觓 郈郋郕訄迠 郕訄郕 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇郋迮 邾郇迮郇邽迮 訄訇郋訄迮 赲 郋郱迡訄郇邽邽 郋郈郋邽赲郅迮郇邽 邽郅邽 郋迡郇邽迮赲訄 邽郇赲迮郋訄邾邽 赲 郋郈迮迡迮郅迮郇郇郋邿 郇迮郱訄赲邽邽邾郋邽 郋 邽 訄郕郋郋赲.
邽郋: 迮郅 郱訄邽邽郅訄 赲郋 PhD 迡邽迮訄邽 赲 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮迮 衪郕迮迮訄 (迮郅邽郕郋訇邽訄郇邽). 迮 迡邽迮訄邽 郈郋赲迮郇訄 邽郱迮郇邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋邿 邾郋訇邽郅邽郱訄邽邽 赲 迮郅郕郋邾 迣郱訄郇迮. 苺 迮郅 邾郇郋迣郋 訄迮邿 郋郈訇郅邽郕郋赲訄郇郇 赲 迮迮郇郱邽郋赲訄郇郇 訄郕訄迡迮邾邽迮郕邽 迠郇訄郅訄, 迮迡邽 郕郋郋 訄 郋 迣郋郇郋迡郋訇赲訄迮邿 郈郋邾郅迮郇郇郋邽: 竄郋迡訄赲郋 郕訄郕 迮, 邾迮迡邽訄郋, 邽 邽郈郋郅郇邽迮郅: 邾迮郇訄 邽 迣郅郋訇訄郅郇訄 郈郋郅邽邽郕訄 郱郋郅郋郋迡郋訇赲訄迮邿 郈郋邾郅迮郇郇郋邽 赲 迣郱訄郇迮罈 迠郋郇郋邾 苭迡迮郋, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 34, Issue 1, March 2015
泭
泭
訄邾郕訄 訄赲郇邽迮郅郇郋迣郋 郈郋迮郕訄 郈郋 郕郅郇郋邾 郇訄郅迮迡邽, 郅訄郇 訄邽邾郋赲 邽邾迮郅 赲郋郱邾郋迠郇郋 郈郋赲迮邽 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 赲 迮郕邽郕迮 赲 邾訄迮 2016 迣郋迡訄. 郅訄郇 郈郋迡迮郅邽 郋訇邽邾邽 赲郈迮訄郅迮郇邽邾邽 郋 赲郋迮邿 郈郋迮郱迡郕邽, 郈迮迡赲訄邽迮郅郇邾邽 迮郱郅訄訄邾邽 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 邽 郇迮郕郋郋邾邽 迮郋迮邽迮郕邽邾邽 訄郱邾郅迮郇邽邾邽. 迮郕邽郕訄 邽邾迮迮 郋迮郇 迡郋郅迣 邽 邽郇迮迮郇 邽郋邽, 郕郋郋訄 郅迠邽 郋郇郋赲郋邿 迡郅 郇邽郕訄郅郇郋邿 邽 邾郇郋迣郋郅郋迠郇郋邿 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇郋邿 邾迮郕邽郕訄郇郕郋邿 邽迡迮郇邽郇郋邽. 郅訄郇 郈郋郈訄迮 郈郋赲迮邽 郇迮郕郋郋迮 郈訄訄郅郅迮郅邽 迣郱訄郇郋邾 迮郅 郈迮迮郋邾郅迮郇邽 郇迮郕郋郋 邾迮郇 郋邽訄郅郇郋-邽郋邽迮郕邽 郈郋迮郋赲.
郅訄郇 訄邽邾郋赲 迡郋迮郇 郕訄迮迡 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽, 苺虷
訄邽邽郅 赲郋 PhD 迡邽迮訄邽 赲 迮邿 虼郕郋郅迮 苤郋邽訄郅郇 訄郕, 訄邽迠-苳訄郇邽 邽 赲 迣郱郕郋邿 郕訄迡迮邾邽邽 訄郕.
泭
泭
赲郋迮邿 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽邽 苠訄訄郅訄邿訇迮郕 訄迮赲 郱訄郋郇迮 郅迮迡邽迮 迮邾:
- 郈郋郅郱郋赲訄郇邽迮 郕邽邽迮郕郋迣郋 邾迮郋迡訄 赲 邽郱迮郇邽邽 邽郋邽邽, 郇訄 郈邽邾迮迮 訄-訇迮郕訄 邽 迣郋迡訄赲迮郇郇 郈訄郱迡郇邽郕郋赲 迣郱訄郇訄. 迡邽郋邽邽 訇迡迮 郈迮迡郋訄赲郅迮郇訄 赲郋郱邾郋迠郇郋 訄邾邽邾 赲邽郅邽 迣郋迡 迣邽訇迮郅邽 訄-訇迮郕訄.
- 郋訄郅郇郋-郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕訄 郋邽邾郋 郇迮郕郋郋 郈訄郱迡郇邽郕郋赲 迣郱訄郇訄.
- 郇訄郕郋邾赲郋 郇郋赲邾 訄邿郋邾, 迣迡迮 郕訄迠迡郋邾 郕迣郱訄郇 郈迮迡郋訄赲郅迮 赲郋郱邾郋迠郇郋 訄邾邽邾 郈邽訄 邽郋邽 赲郋迮邿 迮邾邽, 郇訄迮郅迮郇郇郋迣郋 郈郇郕訄 邽 迮迣邽郋郇訄.
- 郋迮郕 竄迮郱郋郈訄郇邿 迣郱訄郇罈.
苠訄訄郅訄邿訇迮郕 訄郋赲邽 赲郅迮 郕郋郋迡邽郇訄郋郋邾 赲郋郅郋郇迮郋赲 苳迮邽赲訄郅 迡郋郕邾迮郇訄郅郇 邽郅邾郋赲 郈郋 郈訄赲訄邾 迮郅郋赲迮郕訄 竄邽 邿郇郋罈 邽 郈迮郈郋迡訄赲訄迮郅迮邾 邽郋邽邽 邽 郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽 赲 迮迡郇迮邿 郕郋郅迮 60 迣. 邽郕迮郕.
泭
訄郕 迣郋赲郋邽 虴郋郅郈郋郇 虴郋訄迮赲訄, 邽迡迮 郇訄郈邽訄郇邽 訄郕郋迣郋 迮訇郇邽郕訄 赲郋郱郇邽郕郅訄 郇迮迮 郇迮郕郋郅郕郋 郅迮 郇訄郱訄迡, 郕郋迣迡訄 郋郇訄 郇訄訄郅訄 邽訄 郕 郈郋 邽郋邽邽 迣郱訄郇訄 迡迮郇訄邾 苺虷 邽 郇迮 郇訄郅訄 郈郋郅郇郋迮郇郇郋迣郋 迮訇郇邽郕訄, 迣迡迮 訇 郋迡迮迠訄郅訄 赲 邽郋邽 , 郇訄 訄郇迣郅邽邿郕郋邾 郱郕迮.
訄郇郇邿 迮訇郇邽郕 訄迡迮郋赲訄郇 邽 訇迡迮 郈郋郅迮郱迮郇 郇迮 郋郅郕郋 迡郅 邽郇郋訄郇郇 迡迮郇郋赲, 郕郋郋迮 郈邽迮郱迠訄 邽 赲 迣郱訄郇, 郇郋 邽 迡郅 邽郇郋訄郇郇 邽郋赲 赲 迮郅郋邾.
郇郋訄郇, 郈郋 邽 郈邽郱郇訄郇邽, 郈郋郋郇郇郋 訄郅郕邽赲訄 郋赲邽迮邾 郈郋郅郇郋邿 邽 郈郋郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅郇郋邿 邽郇郋邾訄邽邽 郋訇 邽郋邽邽 郇訄迮邿 訄郇 郋 迡迮赲郇迮邿邽 赲迮邾迮郇 迡郋 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇郋邽 郇訄 訄郇迣郅邽邿郕郋邾 郱郕迮.
郋郋迡邽郇訄郋 郈郋迣訄邾邾 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 邽 郋邽郋郅郋迣邽邽 邽 郈迮郈郋迡訄赲訄迮郅 虴郋郅郈郋郇 虴郋訄迮赲訄 迮邽郅訄 訄郇邽 郋 郈郋訇迮郅, 郇訄郈邽訄赲 郇迮訇郋郅郋邿 郈郋 郋訇迮邾, 郇郋 迮邾郕邽邿 迮訇郇邽郕, 郕郋郋邿 迠迮 郈郋郅邽郅 郈郋郅郋迠邽迮郅郇迮 郋郕郅邽郕邽 郋 迡迮郇郋赲 邽 郕郋郅郅迮迣.
泭
赲郋迮邿 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽邽 衪郅邾邽訄 郋迣郋邿訇訄迮赲訄 郈迮迡訄赲邽 迮郱邽 郈郋郅迮赲郋迣郋 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 竄郋郅郋郋 訄郕迮郇訄罈: 苤郋邽郋郕郅郇迮 訄郈迮郕 赲郱訄邽邾郋迡迮邿赲邽 邾迮郇 郋郋訇迮赲 邽 邽郇赲迮郋郋赲 赲 .
郋訇郅迮邾 赲郱訄邽邾郋迡迮邿赲邽 赲 郋訇郅訄邽 邽郱赲郅迮迮郇邽 郈邽郋迡郇 迮郋赲 郇訄邽訇郋郅迮迮 訄郕訄郅郇 迮迣郋迡郇 迡郅 迣郱訄郇訄. 苠邽 迣郅訄赲郇 邽迣郋郕訄 郋迣郋 郈郋迮訄: 邾迮郇郋迮 郋郋訇迮赲郋, 邽郇赲迮郋 邽 迣郋迡訄赲郋 訄郋 郇迮 邾郋迣 郇訄邿邽 郋訇邽邿 郱郕. 苤郋郋赲迮赲迮郇郇郋 邽郇赲迮邽邽郋郇郇邿 郈郋迮郕 赲郋訄邽赲訄迮, 邽郇赲迮郋 郋迡邽 邽郱 訄郇. 郋迡訄赲郋, 邾迮郇迮 郋郋訇迮赲訄 郇邽迮迣郋 郇迮 郈郋郅訄.
郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋郈訄郅郋 郋赲迮邽 郇訄 赲郋郈郋 虴郋 赲郅邽迮 郇訄 訄郱赲邽邽迮 邽郇赲迮邽邽郋郇郇 郈郋迮郕郋赲 赲 郋訇郅訄邽 迡郋訇邽 郈邽郋迡郇 迮郋赲 迣郱訄郇訄? 苠郋郇迮迮: 訄郕邽迮 訄郕郋 郕郋郇郅邽郕郋迣迮郇郇郋邽 郈迮郈赲, 邽 郇訄郋訇郋郋 - 郕訄郕邽迮 訄郕郋 赲郱訄邽邾郋迡迮邿赲邽 郈郋郋訇赲?
衪郅邾邽訄 郋迣郋邿訇訄迮赲訄 - 邽迮郕郋 訄郇訄郅邽邽迮郕郋迣郋 迮郇訄 竄郋郅邽 郱邽罈.
泭
泭
It has been almost 50 years since European and American scholars began insisting that archaeological research must become more scientific.
But while the new technologies and new information that followed made archaeologists ever more capable of practicing science, new participants in the field brought in new ideas that seemed to reject a scientific approach to understanding the past. Now that the fires of disagreement have been doused and the smoke cleared away, archaeologists have begun to realize that the science of archaeology has changed because science has changed. In this talk I will talk about these changes and how archaeology in Europe and America has come to be better science.
Bio
Pr. Pyburn has directed major excavations of three ancient Maya cities in Central America, where she discovered a previously unknown style of water conservation and irrigation technology, developed a new perspective on ancient political economy, and has proposed an alternative explanation for the Maya "collapse." Most recently she has collaborated with colleagues in Central Asia promoting grassroots development of projects for cultural preservation.
Through her work she has inspired students, introduced curricular reforms and promoted the rights of indigenous communities. Pyburn has conducted numerous archaeological field schools in Belize, where she emphasized collaboration with the local community in the context of rigorous scientific research. In Kyrgyzstan, she has worked with archaeologists and citizens' groups to develop projects for cultural resource management.
"Anne is a major international scholar and educator on the leading edge of archaeological and anthropological thought," said Catherine Tucker, chair of the Department of Anthropology. "Her energetic leadership has helped redefine archaeology as a discipline that involves living people as much as those of the past, one that empowers indigenous and minority populations to become active participants in interpreting their cultural heritage."
Pyburn has taught popular undergraduate courses on the scientific method, the ancient Maya and women in prehistory, as well as seminars on research methods, ethics and gender. She was principal investigator for the National Science Foundation-funded Making Archaeology Teaching Relevant to the XXI Century project, founded the Archaeology in Social Context Ph.D. program at IU and directs the Center for Archaeology in the Public Interest. She has chaired the Ethics Committee of the American Anthropological Association and is vice president-elect of the World Archaeological Congress. She has a Bachelor of Arts from Reed College and a Ph.D. from the University of Arizona.
泭
泭
泭
In my dissertation I analysed representations of Soviet socialism in post-Soviet history textbooks and in the life stories of history teachers in Kyrgyzstan. I analysed, first, how the post-Soviet Kyrgyz state reconstructs its Soviet past on the level of official discourse, particularly in school history textbooks, and second, how history teachers as professionals and private citizens relate to the official discourse when making sense of the Soviet past. Answers to these questions contribute to a better understanding of state- and nation-building processes in post- Soviet Kyrgyzstan both in terms of how official discourse is formed and how subjects and official discourse interact.
Based on the analysis of history textbooks, first, I argue that discourse about Soviet socialism in the post-Soviet Kyrgyz history textbooks is ambivalent and contradictory and there is not a new hegemonic discourse about the Soviet past. At the same time, I argue that there is a hegemonic discourse of the Kyrgyz nation-and-state and their modernization in the post-Soviet Kyrgyz history textbooks, which, however, is also ambivalent and contradictory.
I argue that history teachers like history textbooks produced ambivalent and contradictory images of the Soviet past. Moreover, I claim that they have appropriated the hegemonic discourse of the Kyrgyz nation-and-state and their modernization. However, due to the factors of nostalgia and status loss, self-justification or a particular way of appropriation of the official discourse they introduce internal displacements to the hegemonic discourse.
Short Biography
Damira Umetbaeva has defended her PhD dissertation in 2015 at the European University Viadrina in Frankfurt/Oder, Germany. From 2008 until 2012 she was a research fellow at the Georg-Eckert-Institute for International Textbook Research in Brunswick, Germany. At the institute she was embedded with her PhD project Negotiating Kyrgyz Nationhood: Of History Textbooks and History Teachers Attitudes Towards the Soviet Past in the bigger project funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and titled: The Institutionalization of Cultural Models of Interpretation: History Teachers as Mediators between Collective and Individual Memory in Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, and Lithuania.
Damira Umetbaeva has publications in peer-reviewed international academic journals, one of them winning Best Graduate Paper Award in 2014 from the Central Asia Program at the George Washington University, USA. Since January 2016 Damira Umetbaeva is an associate professor at the Journalism and Mass Communications Department of the 2023 51勛圖. She is also a research consultant for several international organizations in Kyrgyzstan. Ms. Umetbaeva has launched new research projects on informal lending and inter-ethnic relations between Kyrgyz and Russians in Kyrgyzstan and in preparation of publications of the research results. Her main research interests include: Politics of Memory Practices, Textbook Research, Relationship between Education and Nation-State Building Processes, Discourse Theory and Methods, Oral History and Biographical Interviews, Anthropology of the State, Minorities and Economic Biographies.
泭
泭
The paper discusses the development of Islamic Education in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Taking as a starting point Ashirbek Muminovs statement that The system of Islamic Learning prevailing in CA was developed mainly during Timurid era (1370-1506), and it has presented until the present day with only insignificant modifications (2010) , we will look how previous system is preserved and what was changed there through different reformist projects such as Development of New System of Islamic Education in Kyrgyzstan ( 2013), Development Concept ( 2013) Standartization of the Curriculum of Islamic Educational Institutions ( 2013)etc. In the presentation, special attention will be paid to the perception of and contribution to those reforms made by Islamic teachers. The presentation will be based on the fieldwork conducted in different regions of Kyrgyzstan between 2013-2015.
Bio: Toktogulova Mukaram is associate professor of AUCA. Teaches at Anthropology Deaprtment. Defended her dissertation in Philology in 2001, and received Kandidat Nauk degree. Currently works on her doctoral dissertation Islamic Education in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan: contested discourses, which is co-supervised by KNU, Bishkek and EHESS, Paris.
泭
泭
Central Asian Gypsies represent a group set apart from the others. The essential difference concerns their nomadic lifestyle the status quo that persisted until 1922. Since the World War II, soviet authorities have undertaken many attempts to assimilate those Gypsies but with no results. Once again this situation took place after 1989 when, in a great chaos and rush, post-soviet republics were being created. In this new, post-soviet reality, Luli, again, ended up being stigmatised by mainstream society. All in all, after long-term repressions over the years, directed against their ethnicity, political actions destinated to create homo sovieticus and falling by the wayside in view of forming brand new states, Asian Gypsies Luli are deprived of explicit features of their identity. This study aims to investigate and understand the identity based on (forced) nomadism, hostility from authorities and society and various influences of national (and soviet), non-gypsy, culture, customs and traditions.
Dorota and Bartek are two independant researchers from Poland. Bartek gratuated from Russian Literature faculty and Dorota got her PhD based upon the dissertation in-between French Literature and Anthropology. They left Poland for a long time in May 2014 and since then they travel and work in Asia. They were recently teaching at Kasetsart University in Bangkok and International Binus University in Jakarta. Besides teaching and research projects, they are writers, journalists and cat lovers.
泭
泭
苭郋 邽 邽郅訄邾 赲郅迮 迡郋邾邽郇邽迮邿 迮郅邽迣邽迮邿 赲 迣郱訄郇迮, 迮迮 郈訄郕邽郕訄 赲郱赲訄迮 訇郋郅邽迮 郈郋 邽 訄郱郇郋迣郅訄邽 赲 郋訇迮赲迮. 苤 郋迡郇郋邿 郋郋郇 邽郅訄邾 郈郋邽赲郋郋 邽郕訄迠迮郇郇郋迮 郈郋郇邽迮 赲迮郕郋邽, 訄郱郅邽郇迮 迡郋邽郅訄邾郕邽迮 赲迮郋赲訄郇邽, 郋訄郇邽赲邽迮 赲 郈訄郕邽郕迮 郕迣郱郋赲 邽 郋赲迮郕郋迮 郈郋郇邽邾訄郇邽迮 郋郅邽 邽 迮郅迮邿 邽郅訄邾訄. 苤 迡迣郋邿 郋郋郇 邽郅訄邾 迣郋迠訄 迮郅邽迣邽郋郱郇迮 郕迮邾邽郕邽迮 邽迡迮郋郅郋迣邽邽, 郕訄郕 邽邾郈郋邽郋赲訄郇郇迮 邽郱赲郇迮, 訄郕 邽 赲郋郱郇邽郕邽迮 赲 迮郱郅訄迮 赲郇迮郇郇邽 郋訄邽郅郇郋-郈郋郅邽邽迮郕邽 訄郕郋郋赲. 苠訄郕邽邾 郋訇訄郱郋邾, 迣郱訄郇 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮 郋訇郋邿 郈邽邾迮 郈郋邽赲郋郋郇邽 邽郅訄邾 訄邾邽邾邽 迠迮 邾郅邾訄郇訄邾邽. 郋邿 訄訇郋迮 邾 訄邾郋邽邾 迡邽郇訄邾邽郕 訄郱赲邽邽 邽郅訄邾訄 赲 迣郱訄郇迮 邽 迡郇郋邽 郋郈赲邽迮 赲訄迠迮郇邽 赲郋迮邿 邽郅訄邾郕郋邿 邽迡迮郇邽郇郋邽.
邽郋:
2011 迣郋迡 邿郕郋郅 郋郅郋訇迮郕郋赲訄 郋郕郇郋邽郅訄 訄郕郅迮 郋郋郕郋赲迮迡迮郇邽, 郋迡迮郅迮郇邽迮 邾迮迠迡郇訄郋迡郇郋邿 迠郇訄郅邽邽郕邽 迣郱郕郋訄郇郕郋迣郋 郇訄郇郋郋訇訄郱郋赲訄迮郅郇郋迣郋 迮郇訄 郈邽 苺, 郈迮邽訄郅邽郱邽郋赲訄郅訄 郇訄 郈迮邽迡郕郋邾 郱郕迮. 郋郅迮 迮訇 迡赲訄 迣郋迡訄 郈郋訄訇郋訄郅訄 郕郋迮郈郋郇迡迮郇郋邾 郇訄 訄邿迮 kloop.kg. 2013 迣郋迡 郈郋迡郋郅迠邽郅訄 邾訄迣邽訄 赲 郋迡迮郅迮郇邽邽 郅訄邾郕郋邿 邽赲邽郅邽郱訄邽邽 邽 郋赲迮邾迮郇郇郋邿 郈郋郅邽邽郕邽 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮訄 郇迮邿 訄訄郅訄邾. 苠迮邾訄 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄迮郅郕郋邿 訄訇郋: 竄The Role of Mass Media in Dawah: A Case Study of Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan罈 (郋-郋赲迮郕邽邿 迣郱訄郇: 郋郅 苤 赲 迡訄訄赲訄迮 (郈邽郱赲迮 郕 邽郅訄邾)罈
泭
泭
A once proud, busy industrial settlement, today Balykchy is a place of rowdy characters, strangers in their own landscape; silence and nostalgia; a broken communist utopia. In this study, historian Yuri Boyanin uses photography and sound in the search of a distinct Kyrgyz experience of communism and post-communism. This is, however, not merely a chronicle of destruction and the meaninglessness that followed. It is an acoustic archaeology of sound that once both repressed and empowered; a search, through thae camera lens and microphone, of a troubled, ruined landscape of factories and industries people once built with their bare hands. This study joins multi-disciplinary conversations - artistic and scholarly - of the utopia in ruins.
Yuri Boyanin is a Bulgarian PhD student of history at La Trobe University, Australia. His field of research is the 1930s Kyrgyzstan. His interests include ethnography, photography, sound. In his work he is trying to tear down old colonial walls and bring together academic disciplines. Yuri has travelled to 104 countries, including all former Soviet republics. He longs to go back to Mongolia, Pakistan and India, and not least Kyrgyzstan, where part of his heart is.
泭
泭
The Eastern Pamir region, Tajikistan, is a semi-deserts biome and lacks forests. Mostly occupied by Kyrgyz people, local habitants experience currently heavy dependency on natural resources. When the Soviet Union broke apart, political and socio-economical frameworks had, as for many other places, changed and state provisonning ceased abruptely. During the Soviet era, energy demands were supported by the State through imported coal, diesel generators and mini hydro power station. After the collapse, the energy supply has among others stopped. On individual and collective basis, locals started collecting plants in the region, tersken (Krascheninnikovia ceratoides) and shybak (Artemisia), in order to heat their houses and cook. . Thus, Murgabians have been sustaining their life only through this process. The problem was designed by some scholars as teresken syndrome (Breckle and Wucherer 2006). Kraudzun, Tobias, Kim Andr矇 Vanselow, Cyrus Samimi 2014. Realities and myths of the Teresken Syndrome An evaluation of the exploitation of dwarf shrub resources in the Eastern Pamirs of Tajikistan. Journal of Environmental Management 132:49-59.
In this regard, I ask: Where there historical antecedents to the collecting practice? How is collecting organized and socially valuated? What are locals points of view toward energy issues? How is the problem addressed from experts on local knowledge? Is there any improvement scheme that could be proposed by convening local practices with state of the arts knowledge on environmental issues?
The aim of the research is to understand how interaction system of harvesters (terskenchiler) function, why they are certain regarding the sustainability future of energy supply and how experience or strong believes or local knowledge effect their perceived suitability of the energy supply. This would show, in general, what the harvesters really think about their energy resources, and help us to understand the unending energy fight process in Eastern Pamir in the context of pre-soviet, during soviet, and independence periods. Especially, how the socio-economic changes during the independence period effected the harvester and why the social systems emerged and its relations to the past life. Lastly, how the Tajikistans transition to market economy is effecting the plan vegetation and local harvesters?
Daler Kaziev is a student at the Environmental Management and Sustainable Development (EMSD) Program, 2023 51勛圖 (AUCA) E-mail: kaziev_d@auca.kg. Daler is passionate about Anthropology, particularly in relation to ecology and resources. His main research field is Pamir.
泭
泭
The Issyk-Kul lake being a part of the landscape participates in material interrelations and processes, but also represents the semiotic side of relations. This interdisciplinary approach takes us to the conception of space as well as the interaction between the material and immaterial worlds of actor-network theory. As a point of descriptive departure, I will advance on the role of material objects around water bodies, i.e. sanatoriums or tanks and ask: how the physical space comes into cooperation with social and political actions? How place making becomes the triggering factor for changing perceptions of the lake and water use in the region? How did the changing landscape and new infrastructure shape the attitudes of people towards the Issyk-Kul Lake? How do people cooperate with the lake and with water in the region? How do people live by the lake and water? What practices do people do with water?
My research project is therefore contributing to the issue of exploring interrelations of socio-cultural dynamics that arise around the contested sacredness of the Issyk-Kul lake, and the economic value it brings to people living in Cholpon-Ata and Jeti-Oguz.
Nurzat has graduated from Anthropology department in 51勛圖in 2005, and continued her studies in Central European University. After completion of her MA and teaching at 51勛圖for 3 years she is currently doing her PhD at the University of Tuebingen.
泭
泭
As teachers, we sometimes face silent classrooms; students who do not understand simple concepts; do not ask any questions and do not seem to bring any interest to what we are so hard trying to teach. There are many different ways to address such issues, and this lecture will discuss one in particular.
Angie Popova will present the findings of her PhD research in educational technology. Her lecture will discuss some of the fundamental principles of learning and point out at how taking these into account when designing lectures, can affect students learning. In her PhD research Angie used podcasts to study whether and how this technology can enhance students learning from lectures. The findings of the research inform on pedagogically and technologically sound approaches to enhance learning from lectures.
泭
泭
Despite the vast amount of research conducted by scholars from different disciplines on Islam in Central Asia, reasons behind the emergence of independent Islamic leaders have remained a largely untapped source for studying reasons for tension between state and religion in secular countries. Scholars have focused on radical and political manifestations of Islam. This study provides a different perspective on Islam in Central Asia by exploring factors for official imams to pledge loyalty to the state and reasons for independent imams to contest the state control and definition of Islam in Kyrgyzstan. It reveals how and why Islamic religious leaders either cooperate with the state or resist the control it exerts over Muslim population. The case studies of two imams from Kara Suu are explored in the study. The analysis of their stories focuses on their education, life experiences, features of the town they lived and worked in, political and economic situation in the country, retaining of material assets, and their personalities.
Short Biography
Nurbek Bekmurzaev is an independent researcher based in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. He holds an MA Degree in Politics and Security (Central Asia) Program from the OSCE Academy in Bishkek.
Nurbek has an extensive experience of conducting research on topics related to state policy toward Islam in Central Asia, conflict prevention mechanisms, religious radicalism, and ethnic violence. He has published a series of articles on factors of religious radicalism in Central Asia.
泭
泭
郋郅迮迮 15 邾邽郅郅邽郋郇郋赲 迮郅郋赲迮郕 郈郋 赲迮邾 邾邽 迠邽赲 郇訄 迮迡赲訄 郋 訇郋訄, 郋邽郋赲郕邽, 邽 郈迮迮訄訇郋郕邽 邾訄迮邽訄郅郋赲, 郕郋郋迮 訇郅邽 赲訇郋迮郇 郕迮邾-郋 迡迣邽邾. 郋 邾郇郋迣邽 訄郇訄 郇郋邿 訇郋 邽 郋邽郋赲郕訄 邾郋訄 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇邾邽 訇郋邽郕訄邾邽 郈迮迡訄赲郅 迮迡邽郇赲迮郇郇 郋邾 郈訄赲郅迮郇邽 赲迮迡邾邽 訇郋赲邾邽 郋郋迡訄邾邽. 迮邾郋 郇訄 赲郕郅訄迡, 郕郋郋邿 郋郇邽 迡迮郅訄 赲 郈訄赲郅迮郇邽迮 郋郋迡訄邾邽, 訇郋邽郕邽 邾郋訄 邽邾迮 郇邽郱郕邽邿 郋邽訄郅郇邿 訄, 訄郅郕邽赲訄 郈邽迮郇迮郇邽邾邽 郋 郋郋郇 郈郋迮迡郇邽郕郋赲 邽 赲郅訄迮邿, 郱訄訄訇訄赲訄 郇訄邾郇郋迣郋 邾迮郇迮 迡迣邽 訄郇邽郕郋赲 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇郋邿 邾郋郇郋邿 郕郋郇郋邾邽郕邽. 衪郋 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇邿 迮郕郋 赲 郈郋郅迮迡郇迮迮 赲迮邾 邽郱訄迮, 赲 郋郇郋赲郇郋邾, 郕郋郇郅訄郇訄邾邽 竄郈郋迮郕郋赲 訄郱赲邽邽罈, 邽 赲赲郋迡 邾郋迠郇郋 郋訇郋訇邽 訄郕: 1) 訇郋邽郕邽 邾郋訄 訇迮迡郇 邽 郱赲邽邾, 2) 訄邽迮郇邽迮 邽 郈訄赲 邽 赲郋郱邾郋迠郇郋迮邿 迮迮郱 郋邾訄郅邽郱訄邽 邽 郇郋邾訄郅邽郱訄邽 郈邽赲迮迡迮 郕 郈郋赲迮郇邽 邽 迡郋郋迡郋赲 邽 郈邽郱郇訄郇邽, 3) 郈郋迡迡迮迠郕訄 邽 邽郇迮迣訄邽 郇郋迣郋 迡訄 訇郋邽郕郋赲 赲郅 迮迡赲郋邾 迡郋邽迠迮郇邽 郋邿邽赲郋迣郋 訄郱赲邽邽 赲 訄郱赲邽赲訄邽 訄郇訄.
苤 郇迮迡訄赲郇邽 郈郋 邾郋郇邿 郈郋郅邽迣郋郇 赲 邽郕迮郕迮 郋迠迮 訄郅 郋訇迮郕郋邾 竄迮郋邾邽郋赲訄郇邽罈. 郈郅訄郇訄 迣郋郋迡郕邽 赲郅訄迮邿 郈郋 邾郋迡迮郇邽郱訄邽邽 邽迮邾 郈訄赲郅迮郇邽 郋郋迡訄邾邽 迮郕郅邽赲訄邽 赲訄郅郕邽 (郕郋郋訄 迮邿訄 郱訄郇邽邾訄迮 郋郕郋郅郋 27 迣迮郕訄郋赲, 邽 郇訄郋迡邽 赲 10 郕邾 郕 迮赲迮 郋 迣郋郋迡訄). 郋郅邽迣郋郇 郈迮赲郋郇訄訄郅郇郋 郈邽赲郅迮郕 赲郇邽邾訄郇邽迮 邾迮迠迡郇訄郋迡郇 郋迣訄郇邽郱訄邽邿 郕訄郕 迣郋郱訄 郋郕迠訄迮邿 迮迡迮, 郇郋 郕郋郅郋迣邽 - 郋 郅邽 郋迡郇訄 郋郋郇訄 赲郋郈郋訄. 苤赲訄郅郕訄 訄郅訄 邾迮郋邾, 迣迡迮 迠邽赲 邽 訄訇郋訄 赲郇迮郇郇邽迮 邾邽迣訄郇, 郈邽迮訄赲邽迮 赲 迣郋郋迡 赲 郈郋邽郕訄 郱訄訄訇郋郕訄 赲 1990-迮, 赲 郇訄迡迮迠迡迮 郇訄郅訄迡邽 迠邽郱郇 邽 郈邽郈郋郋訇邽 郕 郇郋赲郋邿 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋邿 迮訄郅郇郋邽. 訄郱郇郋迮 赲迮邾 迣郋迡訄, 郇訄 赲訄郅郕迮 訄訇郋訄迮 郋 150 迡郋 300 迮郅郋赲迮郕. 衪郇郋迣訄邽迮郕郋迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮, 郈郋赲迮迡迮郇郇郋迮 邿郕郋郕郅 赲 2013 迣郋迡, 郈郋郕訄郱訄郅郋, 郋 赲郋郈邽邽迮 邽訄邽邽 赲 訄邾郕訄 迡邽郕訄 竄訄郱赲邽邽罈 郇迮 郋郋赲迮赲迮 迮訄郅郇郋邿 迠邽郱郇邽 訇郋邽郕郋赲 邾郋訄. 郋郅迮迮 郋迣郋, 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇邽 郋 竄訇迮迡郇郋邽罈 邽 竄郱赲邽邾郋邽罈 郅迡迮邿 郋 赲訄郅郕邽, 郋郕訄郱訄郅邽 郈郋迡 赲郋郈郋郋邾, 訄赲郇郋 郕訄郕 邽 邾郅 迡迮迮郅郇郋邽 郈郋 迡郋邽迠迮郇邽 竄郋邿邽赲郋迣郋 訄郱赲邽邽罈.
訄 赲迮迮 邿郕郋郕郅 郈迮迡訄赲邽 迮郱郅訄 赲郋邽 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽邿 2011 邽 2013 迣郋迡訄, 郈郋郅迮 迮迣郋 邾 郋訇迡邽邾:
郕訄郕 郈郋-訄郱郇郋邾 邾郋迠郇郋 郋郇郋邽 郕 竄迠邽郱郇邽 郇訄 赲訄郅郕迮罈,
郕訄郕 郈迮迡訄赲郅 迠邽郱郇 赲 迣郋郋迡迮 訄訇郋郇邽郕邽 赲訄郅郕邽,
郋 郈郋邽郋迡邽 赲 迡迣邽 竄訄郱赲邽赲訄邽罈 訄郇訄 邽 迣郋郋迡訄 赲 郋郇郋迮郇邽邽 郋郋迡郋赲 邽 訇郋邽郕郋赲 邾郋訄,
郕訄郕邽迮 迮赲 郈訄郕邽郕邽 竄郇郋邾訄郅邽郱訄邽邽罈 邽 竄郋邾訄郅邽郱訄邽邽罈 訄訇郋 訇郋邽郕郋赲 邾郋訄 郱訄訇迮迠郋邾 邽 郇訄郕郋郅郕郋 郋郇邽 郈邽邾迮郇邽邾 赲 郕郋郇迮郕迮 邽郕迮郕訄,
邽, 郇訄郕郋郇迮, 郋 郋邾, 迮赲迮 郅邽 郈郋訇郅迮邾訄 赲郋郋訇迮? 郅邽 郇訄邾 迡郋訄郋郇郋 赲郱迣郅郇 郇訄 竄赲郋郱邾郋迠郇郋罈 郈迮赲訄迮郇邽 邾郋訄 赲 迮? (郇郋赲迮 郈郋迡郋迡).
迡郋郕郅訄迡邽郕迮: 邿郕郋郕郅 郱邽迮赲訄 郋邽郋郅郋迣, 郈郋郅邽郅訄 迮郈迮郇 邾訄迣邽訄 郈郋 郇訄郈訄赲郅迮郇邽 竄苤郋邽訄郅郇訄 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽罈 赲 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邾 赲郋郈迮邿郕郋邾 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮迮 (迡訄郈迮) 赲 2013 迣, 郈迮邽訄郅邽郱邽迮 郈郋 迣郋郋迡郕邽 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽. 郇訄郋迮迮 赲迮邾 郈迮郈郋迡訄迮 郋邽郋郅郋迣邽 赲 苺虷. 迮迮 迮迮 邽郇迮迮郋赲 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 郈迮迡訄赲郅迮郇邽邿 郋 竄郅迮邿 迠邽郱郇邽罈, 訄 訄郕迠迮 郇郋赲 郈郋郋訇郋赲 迮赲郋赲訄郇邽 赲 郅郋赲邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋-郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕邽 邽 郕郋郅郋迣邽迮郕邽 郈郋訇郅迮邾.
郋訇迠迡迮郇邽邽 訄郕迠迮 郈邽邾 訄邽迮 郋邽郋郅郋迣邽, 郕郋郅郋迣邽, 迣訄迠迡訄郇郕邽迮 訄郕邽赲邽, 郋邽訄郅郇迮 訄訇郋郇邽郕邽, 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅邽 迣郋郋迡郕邽 赲郅訄迮邿. 郈邽迣郅訄訄迮邾 赲迮 郇迮訄赲郇郋迡郇 郕 郋邿 郈郋訇郅迮邾迮 迣郋郋迠訄郇 郈邽郋迮迡邽郇邽 郕 竄訄郱迣郋赲郋罈.
泭
泭
邽郕迮郕迮 28 邾郇邽邽郈訄郅郇 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕 郋 迮郅訄 迮, 郋赲訄赲訄訄 訇郋郅迮 郈郋郅郋赲邽郇 訄邿郋郇郋赲 迣郋郋迡訄. 迮 邽迡迮 郇迮 郋 迮郇訄郅郇 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄 (訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄 邽邾迮郇邽 訄郅邽郇郋赲訄, 訄邽郋郇訄郅郇訄 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄), 郕郋郋迮 郇訄郋迡 赲 郋郋迮邾 郋郋郇邽邽 邽 迡郋訄郋郇郋 郈郋郈郅郇, 訄 邽邾迮郇郇郋 郋 訄邿郋郇郇. 郇邽 邽郇訄郇邽 邽郱 迣郋郋迡郕郋迣郋 訇迡迠迮訄, 邽 郇訄 迮迣郋迡郇郇邽邿 迡迮郇 郇迮邾郇郋迣邽迮 迣郋郋迠訄郇迮 郱郇訄 郋訇 邽 迮赲郋赲訄郇邽邽, 邽 迮迮 邾迮郇迮 郈郋郅郱 邽 郅迣訄邾邽. 郋迮郇邽訄郅 迮邽 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕 迮邿訄 邽郈郋郅郱迮 郇迮 郈郋郅郇郋, 邽 赲 郈郋郋郇郇郋 邾迮郇迮邿 迣郋郋迡郕郋邿 迮迡迮 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄邾 郇迮郋訇郋迡邽邾郋 郈郋郇, 迡郅 郕郋迣郋 邽 迡郅 迮迣郋 郋郇邽 迮赲, 邽 郇訄邿邽 郇郋赲 邾郋迡迮郅 訄訇郋.
郈迮迡郅訄迣訄迮邾 郈郋邾郋迮 郇訄 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕邽 赲 郕郋郇迮郕迮 訄郱赲邽邽 迣郋郋迡訄, 郇郋赲 迮郇郋郅郋迣邽邿, 迣郋郋迡郕郋邿 郕郅 邽 郈郋迮訇郇郋迮邿 迣郋郋迠訄郇. 訇迠迡迮郇邽迮 訇迡迮 郈郋赲迮郇郋 赲郋郈郋訄邾:
- 郕訄郕郋赲郋 邾迮郋 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕 赲 迣郋郋迡迮?
- 迡郅 郕郋迣郋 訄訇郋訄 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕邽?
- 郕訄郕邽迮 邽郱邾迮郇迮郇邽 郇迠郇 赲 訄訇郋迮 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕, 邽 赲迮邿 邽迮邾?
- 邾郋迣 郅邽 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕邽 訄 郇郋赲邾邽 郋訇迮赲迮郇郇邾邽 郈郋訄郇赲訄邾邽?
訄 赲迮迮 訄訄郇郇訄 苤訄郕迮迮赲訄 (竄郋郋迡郕邽迮 邽郇邽邽訄邽赲罈) 邽 衪邾邽郅 訄邽迡邽郇郋赲 (苳訄郕郅迮 郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 苺虷) 郈迮迡訄赲 迮郱郅訄 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽, 郕郋郋郋迮 迡訄迮 郋迮郇郕 迮郕迮迣郋 郋郋郇邽 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕, 邽 郈郋迮訄迮邾郋邽 邽 郈郋迮郇邽訄郅訄 迡郅 邽郱邾迮郇迮郇邽 邾郋迡迮郅邽 訄訇郋 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕. 郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅郋 郋郇迡郋邾 竄郋郋迡郕邽迮 邽郇邽邽訄邽赲罈 郋赲邾迮郇郋 苳訄郕郅迮郋邾 郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 苺虷 邽 訄訇郋訄郋邽迮邿 苤 苺郇邽赲迮邽迮訄 虷迮郇訄郅郇郋邿 郱邽邽, 郈邽 郈郋迡迡迮迠郕迮 邾邽邽.
郋郅迮 郈迮郱迮郇訄邽邽, 郋郋邽 郋訇迠迡迮郇邽迮 訄邽迮邾 訇邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄迮邿, 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣郋赲, 訄邽迮郕郋郋赲, 訄郕邽赲郇 迣郋郋迠訄郇 邽 郈迮迡訄赲邽迮郅迮邿 邾邽邽 迣郋郋迡訄 邽郕迮郕.
迣訄郇邽郱訄郋: 苳 "郋郋迡郕邽迮 邽郇邽邽訄邽赲", 郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽迮郕邽邿 郕郅訇 邽 邽訇郅邽郋迮郕訄 苺虷.
迮邾, 邾迮郋: 14 郋郕訇, 17:30 , 郇郋赲邿 郕訄邾郈 苺虷 ( 12 邾邽郕郋訄邿郋郇), 郕訄訇邽郇迮 330, 3 訄迠.
郋郇訄郕 迡郅 苤 邽 訄郇邽郕郋赲:
邿郕訄郇 迮訇邽迮赲訄, aikanysh@urban.kg (0555) 222 752
訄訄郇郇訄 苤訄郕迮迮赲訄, raushanna@urban.kg. (0771) 560 113
郋郋迡郕邽迮 訄郱迣郋赲郋 -郋 郇迮郋邾訄郅郇訄 郈郅郋訄迡郕訄 迡郅 郋訇迠迡迮郇邽 訄郕訄郅郇 赲郋郈郋郋赲 迣郋郋迡郕郋迣郋 訄郱赲邽邽 邽 邾邽郋赲 迮郇迡迮郇邽邿 赲 迮迮 訇訄郇邽邽郕邽. 迮赲迮 邾迮郋郈邽邽 郈郋郅邽 赲 邽郕迮郕迮 赲 2013 迣郋迡 郈郋 邽郇邽邽訄邽赲迮 邽郕迮郕郕郋迣郋 郋郋迡郕郋迣郋 迮郇迮訄, 迮邿訄 郈郅郋訄迡郕訄 訄訇郋訄迮 赲 訄邾郕訄 邽郕迮郕 苺訇訄郇 苳郋邾訄 邽 郈郋迡迡迮迠邽赲訄迮 苳郋郇迡郋邾 苤郋郋-迣郱訄郇. 郋迡郋訇郇 邽郇郋邾訄邽 邽 郕訄郅迮郇迡訄 赲迮 邾郋迠郇郋 郈郋邾郋迮 郇訄 訄邿迮
泭
泭
The protection of Intellectual Property (IP) rights is a core roadblock and a prerequisite for the development of knowledge-based economy of any country. Higher education institutions which bear the great responsibility in managing and organizing education on protection of IP (copyright, academic honesty and respective issues) face some generic challenges, such as: development of policies, procedures and/or regulations of IP; prevention of violation of copyright such as plagiarism and academic honesty, etc.
The PhD research of Ani Shahinyan looks into IP policies at state and university level, existing practices, courses, programs which inform the implementation of Intellectual property rights, and related problems and challenges.
Anis visit to 51勛圖matches existing processes at 51勛圖of improving academic honesty, copyright issues, and Intellectual Property. As a higher-education institution, we care of educating young people to move forward a knowledge-based economy, to be good citizens, as well as we try to stimulate their creativity and intellectual potential. At the same time, we need to foster the same attitudes in our staff. A discussion on Intellectual property rights is timely and necessary. Your contribution to it will be invaluable.
Ani Shahinyan is Coordinator at the Centre for Quality Assurance; Yerevan State Linguistic University after V. Brusov, Republic of Armenia. She has worked as a Coordinator of The Professional Development and Training Programme, at her home university, where she is currently PhD Student at the Department of Education Management and Planning.
泭
泭
訄郇郇郋迮 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 訄郇訄郅邽郱邽迮 郋郅 迡迮郇迮迠郇 郈迮迮赲郋迡郋赲 迣郱郕邽 邽 苠訄迡迠邽郕郕邽 迡郋赲 邾邽迣訄郇郋赲 赲 郋邽邽 赲 訄郱赲邽邽邽 郋邽迮郅郇郋迣郋 迮郕郋訄 赲 迣郱訄郇迮 邽 苠訄迡迠邽郕邽訄郇迮. 郋郈郋 訄邾訄邽赲訄迮 赲 迮 迮訄: 1) 郕訄郕 郋郅邽 (邽郕迮郕 邽 訄郇訇迮) 訄 赲 赲郋 - 邾郇郋迣郋訄迠郇郋迮 迠邽郅郋迮 郋邽迮郅赲郋, 2) 郕訄郕 郋郅邽 訄 赲 邽邽郇 郱訄 迮 郇郋赲郋郋迮郕 邽 邾訄訄郅郅迮邿, 邽 3) 郕訄郕 郋 迡郋邾訄 赲 迮郅郕邽 迮迣邽郋郇訄. 郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 赲赲邽郅郋 邾郇郋迣郋 郋迡赲訄 赲 迡赲 訄郇訄, 邽 赲 郋 迠迮 赲迮邾 邾郇郋迣郋 訄郱郅邽邽邿, 郋訇郇迮邾 郈郋郅邽邽迮郕郋邿, 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋邿 邽 郋邽訄郅郇郋-郕郅郇郋邿 郈郋郱邽邽邿. 郅訄赲郇邿 赲赲郋迡: 郈邽郋迡訄 郈郋郅邽邽迮郕郋迣郋 迮迠邽邾訄 邽迣訄迮 訇郋郅 郋郅 赲 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋邾 訄郱赲邽邽邽 郕訄郕 迣郋郋迡郕邽, 訄郕 邽 迮郅郕邽 迮迣邽郋郇郋赲. 迮郱迮郇訄邽 赲郕郅邽 赲 迮訇 訄郇訄郅邽邽迮郕邽迮 郕訄, 郋郋迣訄邽邽, 訄邽邽郕 邽 迠邽郱郇迮郇郇迮 邽郋邽邽 邾邽迣訄郇郋赲.
苤郈邽郕迮: 衪邾邽郅 訄邽迡邽郇郋赲, PhD, 迡郋迮郇 郕訄迮迡 訄郇郋郈郋郅郋迣邽邽 苺虷. 郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽迮 郈郋赲郋迡邽郅郋 郈邽 郈郋迡迡迮迠郕迮 DFID, UK.
郱訄赲迮迮郇邽邽 赲郈郅迮郇邽, 訄訄郇郇訄 苤訄郕迮迮赲訄 (苳 郋郋迡郕邽迮 郇邽邽訄邽赲) 郈迮迡郅訄迣訄迮 郈郋赲迮邽 迡邽郕邽 郈郋迮邽迮郅邾邽 郈郋 郅迮迡邽邾 赲郋郈郋訄邾: 郋 迠迮 訇迡迮 迠邽 赲郋 邾郇郋迠迮赲迮 郋邽 迡郋邾郋赲 赲 邽郕迮郕迮 邽 郕郋邾 郋郇邽 郈郋 郕訄邾訄郇訄邾? 訄郕郋郅郕郋 郕郋郇郋邾邽迮郕郋迮 訇郅訄迣郋郈郋郅邽迮 邾邽迣訄郇郋赲 郋訄迠訄迮 郇訄 郋邽迮郅郇郋邾 迮郕郋迮 赲 迮郅郋邾? 訄訄郇郇訄 郈迮迡郅訄迣訄迮 郈郋邾郋迮 郇訄 訄郱赲邽邽迮 迣郋郋迡訄 郈郋郱邽邽邽 迮郱郅訄郋赲 邽郅迮迡郋赲訄郇邽 邽 郈郋郈訄 郈郋郇, 郕訄郕 邽訄邽 邾邽迣訄郇訄邾邽 赲 迮郅郋邾 郕訄迠迮 郇訄 郇訄邽 迣郋郋迡訄 邽 迮迣邽郋郇訄.
泭
September 10, 2015
Dr. Julie McBrien
Problematic Marriages in Kyrgyzstan
泭
How do men and women in Kyrgyzstan contract a marriage? Does the way a marriage is contracted say anything about the long-term viability of the marriage or the happiness of the bride, groom, and their families? And, how and by whom are these various forms of marriage evaluated? In this talk, McBrien will discuss the research she is currently carrying out in Kyrgyzstan on problematic marriages, a study embedded in a wider ERC funded research project she co-directs at the University of Amsterdam called Problematizing Muslim Marriages.
In contemporary Kyrgyzstan, at least four forms of concluding a marriage are taken to be problematic bride abduction, nike marriages, polygamous marriages, and rather recently marriages between Kyrgyz and non-Kyrgyz. In addition, the rising costs of the most acceptable mode of marriage, and the lengths some are willing to go to finance these, are viewed as troublesome for many. These ways of getting married are matters of concern for the bride, groom, and direct families involved; they are likewise contested by local publics (e.g. wider kin, networks of sociability, village/town residents, etc.), those who would speak for the nation and, at least in the case of bride abduction, international governments and non-governmental agencies. Yet there is a significant difference in what is perceived of as problematic for the various actors involved in debating these marriages forms. For example, the frustrations of a young womens parents over her abduction may reside in their inappropriateness of the match while an NGO involved in securing the brides autonomous rights might be at the base of their concern. This research aims to understand and identify what matters of concern these marriages materialize for the various actors who see and create them as problematic. It aims to read the diverging matters of concern in light of one another but also, importantly, against the short/mid-term trajectories of marriages concluded in these ways. In this way it will investigate whether and how problematic issues identified in the form of marriage conclusion continue to play out in the mid-range run of the marriage.
Dr. Julie McBrien is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Amsterdam and co-directs the ERC funded research project Problematizing Muslims Marriages, based at the UvAs AISSR. She has conducted multiple research projects in Kyrgyzstan including work on Islam and politics. Her work can be found in journals like JRAI, Material Religion, Anthropology Today and Critique of Anthropology. She teaches anthropological courses on religion, methods, and general theory.
泭
泭
With its independence in 1991, Kyrgyzstan has experienced a great increase in religious communities and institutions. In her current PhD research Yanti Hoelzchen addresses the increase of Islamic institutions (i.e. mosques, madrasas and Islamic NGOs) and looks into the ways how these actively promote religious knowledge.
In her talk, Yanti will introduce data she has collected on madrasas throughout northern Kyrgyzstan during her field research in spring/summer 2014 and 2015. She will introduce the general workings and features of the madrasas she visited, and further frame her analysis within a ritual economy approach. This perspective helps to show how madrasas can be understood as materialized forms of worldview (Wells and McAnany 2008), and how economic and religious activities are inherently intertwined within these institutions for religious education. Furthermore, a ritual economy perspective illustrates how madrasas in northern Kyrgyzstan are imbedded not only within their local contexts, but stretch out their connections to broader networks on regional, national and global level.
Yanti Hoelzchen has studied Social and Cultural Anthropology at Tuebingen University (Germany). Since October 2013 she is a PhD candidate at the interdisciplinary Collaborative Research Center 1070 ResourceCultures (funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)).
Based on the Research Centers aim of understanding and re-conceptualizing resources in regard to their social and cultural meanings, Yantis PhD project Religious resources: achieving and converting resources in Central Asia - Kyrgyzstan's new mosques." explores (1) both the material and immaterial means that are required, acquired and transformed in order to establish and maintain institutions such as mosques and madrasas; and (2) looks at the socio-cultural dynamics that result from this engagement with these specific material and immaterial means.
泭